between values

Sources

Every citation used anywhere on the site, in one place. Context for how these are used is on the methodology page — this list is for verifying a specific claim.

Site-wide sources

  1. Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2022). Personal Values Across Cultures.

    Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 517–546. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-125100

    Used for: Cross-cultural framing of what makes a value widely shared.

  2. Schwartz, S. H., & Cieciuch, J. (2022). Measuring the Refined Theory of Individual Values in 49 Cultural Groups: Psychometrics of the Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire.

    Assessment, 29. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1073191121998760

    Used for: Cross-cultural framing of what makes a value widely shared.

  3. UNESCO. (2015). Global Citizenship Education: Topics and Learning Objectives.

    UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232993

    Used for: Framing for values education aimed at a general audience.

  4. Basarkod, G., Cahill, C., Noetel, M., et al. (2026). Educational interventions are effective in improving students' ethical and moral outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Nature Human Behaviour. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-026-02456-x

    Used for: The moderator finding that discussion-based programs outperformed lecture-only ones — cited for that specific result inside the review, not as a study of interactive ethics education itself.

All links verified live 2026-09-01.

Dilemma-specific sources

No published dilemma currently cites an external source — each one is a fictional, composite scenario rather than an account of a real event or a claim of fact. If a future dilemma states something as fact, its source will be listed here, per editorial policy.